Definitions and Application
In this Act:
approving authority means whichever of the following applies:
for land located in a municipality, the municipal council;
for land located in a regional district, excluding municipalities, treaty lands and Nisg̱a'a Lands, the regional district board;
for treaty lands, the governing body of the treaty first nation;
for land located in Nisg̱a'a Village Lands, the Nisg̱a'a Village Government;
for land located in Nisg̱a'a Lands, excluding Nisg̱a'a Village Lands, the Nisg̱a'a Lisims Government;
in relation to land located outside British Columbia, the local government body that has similar authority in relation to that land;
approving officer means
an approving officer as defined in the Land Title Act, and
in relation to land located outside British Columbia, a person who performs a similar function;
Authority means the BC Financial Services Authority established under section 2 of the Financial Services Authority Act;
bare land strata lot means
a strata lot in a bare land strata plan, and
in relation to land located outside British Columbia, a similar lot;
bare land strata plan means
a bare land strata plan as defined in the Strata Property Act, and
in relation to land located outside British Columbia, a similar plan;
brokerage means a person licensed as a brokerage under the Real Estate Services Act;
consolidated disclosure statement means a statement filed with the superintendent under section 15.2 [consolidated disclosure statements];
cooperative association means that owns, leases or has a right to acquire land;
a corporation, as defined in the Business Corporations Act,
a limited liability company, as defined in the Business Corporations Act,
a partnership, and
cooperative interest means an interest that includes both
a right
of ownership, directly or indirectly, of one or more shares in the cooperative association, or
to be a partner or member, directly or indirectly, in the cooperative association, and
as a result of the right described in paragraph (a), a right to use or occupy a part of the land in which a cooperative association has an interest;
deposit means money paid by a purchaser to a developer in relation to a development unit before the purchaser acquires title or any other interest in the development unit;
developer means a person who, directly or indirectly, owns, leases or has a right to acquire or dispose of development property, unless the person is, or is in a class of persons which is, excluded by regulation;
development property means any of the following:
5 or more subdivision lots in a subdivision, unless each lot is 64.7 ha or more in size;
5 or more bare land strata lots in a bare land strata plan;
5 or more strata lots in a stratified building;
2 or more cooperative interests in a cooperative association;
5 or more time share interests in a time share plan;
2 or more shared interests in land in the same parcel or parcels of land;
5 or more leasehold units in a residential leasehold complex;
development unit means any of the following in a development property:
a subdivision lot;
a bare land strata lot;
a strata lot;
a cooperative interest;
a time share interest;
a shared interest in land;
a leasehold unit;
director means
in the case of a corporation as defined in the Business Corporations Act, a director as defined in that Act, and
in the case of a partnership or other entity,
a person who holds the title of director, and
a person who, by whatever name designated, performs the functions of a director of a corporation;
disclosure statement means a statement that discloses material facts about a development property, prepared in accordance with section 14 (2) [filing disclosure statements], and includes a consolidated disclosure statement, a phase disclosure statement and an amendment made to a disclosure statement;
financial services tribunal means the financial services tribunal under the Financial Institutions Act;
land title office means
a land title office under the Land Title Act, and
in relation to land located outside of British Columbia, an office that performs a similar function;
leasehold unit means a unit in a residential leasehold complex;
market means
to sell or lease,
to offer to sell or lease, and
to engage in any transaction or other activity that will or is likely to lead to a sale or lease;
material fact means, in relation to a development unit or development property, any of the following:
a fact, or a proposal to do something, that affects, or could reasonably be expected to affect, the value, price, or use of the development unit or development property;
the identity of the developer;
the appointment, in respect of the developer, of a receiver, liquidator or trustee in bankruptcy, or other similar person acting under the authority of a court;
any other prescribed matter;
misrepresentation means
a false or misleading statement of a material fact, or
an omission to state a material fact;
new purchaser means a purchaser who has not previously received from a developer a disclosure statement in relation to the development unit or development property;
phase disclosure statement means a statement filed with the superintendent under section 15.1 [phase disclosure statements];
previously occupied building means a building that has been occupied at any time in its past for any purpose, including residential, commercial, institutional, recreational or industrial use;
purchase agreement means a contract of purchase and sale or a contract to lease;
purchaser means
a purchaser, from a developer, of a development unit,
a lessee, from a developer, of a development unit, and
a prospective purchaser or lessee, from a developer, of a development unit;
residential leasehold complex means a complex containing one or more buildings capable of being used, in whole or in part, for leasehold residential purposes, other than buildings comprised of strata lots, cooperative interests or shared interests in land;
sketch plan means
a sketch plan as defined in the Land Title Act, and
in relation to land located outside British Columbia, a similar plan;
strata lot means
a strata lot as defined in the Strata Property Act in a stratified building, and
in relation to land located outside of British Columbia, a similar interest;
strata plan means
any strata plan as referred to in the Strata Property Act, and
in relation to land located outside British Columbia, a similar plan;
stratified building means a building subject to a strata plan that is not a bare land strata plan;
subdivision means land that is divided into lots or parcels, other than under the Strata Property Act;
subdivision lot means a lot or parcel in a subdivision;
superintendent means the Superintendent of Real Estate appointed under section 2.1 (1) of the Real Estate Services Act;
This Act applies to a developer who markets, in British Columbia, a development unit.
This Act applies regardless of whether
the development unit being marketed is located in British Columbia or not,
the land that a developer owns, leases or has a right to acquire or dispose of
has not yet been divided into development units, or
is divided once or in successive stages, if, in the opinion of the superintendent, the successive divisions occur reasonably close in time, or
a developer
markets development units relating to the same development property simultaneously or at different times, or
does not intend to market one or more development units within a development property.
Marketing and Holding Deposits
Marketing Requirements Generally
A developer who markets or intends to market a development unit must
meet the applicable requirements of Division 2 [Preliminary Requirements or Approvals],
ensure that arrangements have been made in accordance with Division 3 [Title Assurance and Utility Payments]
to assure the purchaser's title or other interest for which the purchaser has contracted, and
to pay the cost of utilities and other services, and
file and provide a disclosure statement in accordance with Division 4 [Disclosure Statements].
A developer who receives a deposit must deal with the deposit in accordance with Division 5 [Deposits].
Preliminary Requirements or Approvals
A developer must not market a subdivision lot or a bare land strata lot unless, in relation to the subdivision lot or bare land strata lot,
a subdivision plan or bare land strata plan, as applicable, has been deposited in a land title office, or
an approving officer has given preliminary layout approval.
A developer must not market a strata lot or a leasehold unit unless, in relation to the strata lot or leasehold unit,
a strata plan or sketch plan, as applicable, has been deposited in a land title office, or
the appropriate municipal or other government authority has issued a building permit in relation to the strata lot or leasehold unit.
In addition to the requirement under subsection (1), a developer must not market a strata lot that is created or intended to be created by the conversion of a previously occupied building in British Columbia, unless, in relation to the strata lot, the requirements of section 242 [approval for conversion of previously occupied buildings] of the Strata Property Act have been met.
A developer must not market a cooperative interest that includes a right of use or occupation of a building unless the appropriate municipal or other government authority has issued a building permit in relation to the land that is to be subject to the cooperative interest.
In addition to the requirement under subsection (1), a developer must not market a cooperative interest that is created or intended to be created by the conversion of a previously occupied building in British Columbia, unless, in relation to the cooperative interest, an approving authority has given approval for the conversion.
A developer must not market a cooperative interest that does not include a right of use or occupation of a building unless the appropriate municipal or other government authority has given development approval in relation to the land that is to be subject to the cooperative interest.
A developer must not market a time share interest unless
the land, accommodations and facilities that are subject to the time share plan can be lawfully used or occupied by a purchaser, or
the appropriate municipal or other government authority has, in relation to the land that is to be subject to the time share interest,
if the time share interest includes a right of use, occupation or possession of a building, issued a building permit, or
in any other case, given development approval.
Despite section 2 (2) (a) [application], this section does not apply to a shared interest in land that is located outside British Columbia.
A developer must not market a shared interest in land that includes a right of use or occupation of a building unless the appropriate municipal or other government authority has issued a building permit in relation to the land that is to be subject to the shared interest in land.
In addition to the requirement under subsection (2), a developer must not market a shared interest in land that includes a right of use or occupation of a previously occupied building unless an approving authority has given approval, in accordance with subsection (5), to market the shared interest in land.
A developer must not market a shared interest in land that does not include a right of use or occupation of a building unless an approving officer has given approval, in accordance with subsection (6), to market the shared interest in land.
For the purpose of subsection (3),
section 242 (1) to (6) and (11) [approval for conversion of previously occupied buildings] of the Strata Property Act applies in respect of the intended marketing as if it were an intended conversion into strata lots under that Act, and
the approving authority must deal with the matter as if the intended marketing were an intended conversion into strata lots under that Act.
For the purpose of subsection (4), an approving officer, within 2 months of receiving an application for approval, or within a longer period prescribed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council, must
consider
the public interest,
any criteria prescribed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council, and
any other matter that the approving officer considers to be relevant, and
notify the developer, in writing, that
the approval is granted,
the approval is refused until conditions specified in the notice are met, or
the approval is refused, in which case, the notice must set out the reasons for the refusal.
A developer must not market a shared interest in land that is located outside British Columbia unless
the shared interest in land can be lawfully used or occupied by a purchaser, or
the appropriate municipal or other government authority has, in relation to the land that is to be subject to the shared interest in land,
if the shared interest in land includes a right of use or occupation of a building, issued a building permit, or
in any other case, given development approval.
approval in principle to construct or otherwise create the development unit from the appropriate municipal or other government authority, and
the superintendent's permission to begin marketing.
In relation to a permission given under subsection (1) (b), the superintendent may
attach conditions to the permission, and
at any time, revoke the permission.
The superintendent may publish, in accordance with the regulations, a policy statement setting out circumstances in which permission will be deemed to be granted under subsection (1) (b) to developers who are described by the circumstances set out in the notice.
If the superintendent publishes a policy statement under subsection (3), a developer who is described by the circumstances set out in the policy statement
is deemed to have the superintendent's permission under subsection (1) (b), and
must comply with the terms and conditions, if any, that are stated in the policy statement.
Title Assurance and Utility Payments
A developer must not market a development unit unless the developer has made adequate arrangements to ensure that a purchaser of the development unit will have assurance of title or of the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted.
For the purpose of subsection (1), a developer has made adequate arrangements to ensure that a purchaser of a development unit will have assurance of title or of the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted if
arrangements have been made for title to the development unit to be held in trust by a lawyer, notary public or another person, or class of persons, specified by the superintendent until title or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted is assured,
the developer provides a bond to the superintendent or other person specified by the superintendent for the benefit and protection of purchasers, with surety in the amount and subject to the terms required by the superintendent, or
the developer has made other arrangements that are satisfactory to the superintendent.
ensure that the mortgage, lien or other encumbrance provides, without condition, that a purchaser who complies with the terms and conditions of the purchaser's purchase agreement obtains title, or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted, free and clear of the mortgage, lien or other encumbrance, or
make other arrangements, satisfactory to the superintendent, to assure title or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted.
A developer must not market a development unit unless the developer has made adequate arrangements to ensure payment of the cost of utilities and other services associated with the development unit.
For the purpose of subsection (1), a developer has made adequate arrangements to ensure payment of the cost of utilities and other services associated with the development unit if
arrangements have been made for title to the development unit to be held in trust by a lawyer, notary public or another person, or class of persons, specified by the superintendent until the cost of utilities and other services associated with the development unit has been paid,
the developer provides a bond to the superintendent or other person specified by the superintendent for the benefit and protection of purchasers, with surety in the amount and subject to the terms required by the superintendent, or
the developer has made other arrangements that are satisfactory to the superintendent.
The superintendent may publish, in accordance with the regulations, a policy statement setting out circumstances in which arrangements made under section 11 (2) (c) and (3) (b) [assurance of title] or 12 (2) (c) [utilities and services] are deemed adequate for the purpose of those sections.
If the superintendent publishes a policy statement under subsection (1), a developer who has made the arrangements set out in the policy statement
is deemed to have made adequate arrangements to ensure as applicable, and
that a purchaser of a development unit will have assurance of title or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted, or
payment of the cost of utilities and other services associated with a development unit,
must comply with the terms and conditions, if any, that are stated in the policy statement.
Disclosure Statements
A developer must not market a development unit unless the developer has
prepared a disclosure statement respecting the development property in which the development unit is located, and
filed with the superintendent
the disclosure statement described under paragraph (a), and
any records required by the superintendent under subsection (3).
A disclosure statement must
be in the form and include the content required by the superintendent,
without misrepresentation, plainly disclose all material facts,
set out the substance of a purchaser's rights to rescission as provided under section 21 [rights of rescission], and
be signed as required by the regulations.
A developer must provide to the superintendent any records the superintendent requires to support any statement contained in the disclosure statement filed under subsection (1).
Without limiting section 16 [non-compliant disclosure statements], if a developer markets development units in phases, the developer, before marketing each successive phase, must file with the superintendent an amendment to a disclosure statement submitted in respect of the previous phase.
Despite subsection (4), a developer who markets development units in a successive phase of a strata plan that is the subject of a Phased Strata Plan Declaration under the Strata Property Act need not file an amendment to a disclosure statement if both of the following apply:
the developer files a phase disclosure statement under section 15.1 [phase disclosure statements] before marketing development units in the successive phase;
the developer does not market any development units in any previous phase of the development property.
On a person's payment of the prescribed fee, the superintendent must
permit the person to inspect, at the superintendent's office and during regular business hours, a disclosure statement filed under this section, and
provide a copy of a disclosure statement filed under this section, or a copy of part of it, to a person who requests it.
A developer must not enter into a purchase agreement with a purchaser for the sale or lease of a development unit unless
a copy of the disclosure statement prepared in respect of the development property in which the development unit is located has been provided to the purchaser,
the purchaser has been afforded reasonable opportunity to read the disclosure statement, and
the developer has obtained a written statement from the purchaser acknowledging that the purchaser had an opportunity to read the disclosure statement.
A developer must
retain a written statement obtained under subsection (1) (c) for a period of 3 years or a longer period prescribed by regulation, and
produce the written statement for inspection by the superintendent on the superintendent's request.
Despite section 4 (2) of the Electronic Transactions Act, a developer may provide a copy of a disclosure statement by electronic means only with the written consent of the purchaser.
A developer who markets development units in a strata plan that is the subject of a Phased Strata Plan Declaration under the Strata Property Act
may, before marketing development units in a phase, file with the superintendent a phase disclosure statement under this section, and
may provide the phase disclosure statement to a new purchaser.
A developer must ensure that a phase disclosure statement complies with section 14 (2) [filing disclosure statements] in relation to the development property and the development units in the phase.
Despite any provisions in this Act or the regulations, but subject to subsection (4), if a developer provides a phase disclosure statement to a new purchaser of a development unit in a phase, the developer need not provide to the new purchaser
the first disclosure statement filed in relation to the development property by the developer,
any amendment to a disclosure statement filed prior to or at the same time as the filing of the phase disclosure statement,
any consolidated disclosure statements filed in relation to other phases of the development property, or
any phase disclosure statements filed in relation to other phases of the development property.
A new purchaser who receives a phase disclosure statement may request in writing a copy of a disclosure statement referred to in subsection (3) (a), (b), (c) or (d), and the developer must provide to the new purchaser, without charge, a copy of the disclosure statement no later than 30 days after receipt of the request.
A developer who files an amendment to a disclosure statement, including an amendment to a phase disclosure statement,
may also file with the superintendent a consolidated disclosure statement under this section, and
may provide the consolidated disclosure statement to a new purchaser.
A developer must ensure that a consolidated disclosure statement contains the following:
in the case of a phase of a development property with respect to which a phase disclosure statement has been filed, the content of the phase disclosure statement filed in relation to the phase as modified by any subsequently filed amendment to the phase disclosure statement;
in every other case, the content of the first disclosure statement in relation to the development property filed by the developer as modified by any subsequently filed amendment to the first filed disclosure statement.
Despite any provision in this Act or the regulations, but subject to subsection (4), if a developer provides a consolidated disclosure statement to a new purchaser, the developer need not provide to the new purchaser
the first disclosure statement filed in relation to the development property by the developer,
the phase disclosure statement in a case where the consolidated disclosure statement is in relation to a phase of a development property with respect to which a phase disclosure statement has been filed,
any amendments to a disclosure statement filed prior to or at the same time as the filing of the consolidated disclosure statement, or
any consolidated disclosure statement previously filed in relation to the development property.
A new purchaser who receives a consolidated disclosure statement may request in writing a copy of any disclosure statement referred to in subsection (3) (a), (b), (c) or (d), and the developer must provide to the new purchaser, without charge, a copy of the disclosure statement no later than 30 days after receipt of the request.
If a developer becomes aware that a disclosure statement does not comply with the Act or regulations, or contains a misrepresentation, the developer must immediately
a new disclosure statement, or
an amendment to the disclosure statement that clearly identifies and corrects the failure to comply or the misrepresentation, and
within a reasonable time after filing a new disclosure statement or an amendment under paragraph (a), provide a copy of the disclosure statement or amendment to each purchaser
who is entitled, at any time, under section 15 [providing disclosure statements to purchasers] to receive the disclosure statement, and
who has not yet received title, or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted, to the development unit in the development property that is the subject of the disclosure statement.
A developer must file a new disclosure statement under subsection (1) (a) (i) if the failure to comply or misrepresentation referred to in that subsection
is of such a substantial nature that the superintendent gives notice to the developer that a new disclosure statement must be filed.
A developer who is required to file a new disclosure statement or an amendment under subsection (1) must not market a development unit in the development property that is the subject of the new disclosure statement or amendment
until the developer has complied with subsection (1) (a), or
unless permitted by the superintendent.
The superintendent is not under any duty to determine any of the following:
the merits of any statement contained in a disclosure statement;
whether a disclosure statement contains a misrepresentation;
whether a disclosure statement filed with the superintendent, or the information contained in it, meets the requirements of this Act and the regulations.
Deposits
A developer who receives a deposit from a purchaser in relation to a development unit must promptly place the deposit with a brokerage, lawyer, notary public or prescribed person who must hold the deposit as trustee in a trust account in a savings institution in British Columbia.
A trustee under subsection (1) holds the deposit for the developer and the purchaser and not as an agent for either of them and must not release the deposit from trust except as follows:
if the money was paid into the trust account in error;
to the purchaser with the written consent of the purchaser and the developer;
in accordance with section 19 [developer use of deposit] of this Act;
in accordance with section 21 [rights of rescission] of this Act;
in accordance with section 32 [unclaimed money held in trust] of the Real Estate Services Act;
in accordance with section 33 [payment of trust funds into court] of the Real Estate Services Act;
in accordance with a court order;
in accordance with the regulations under this Act.
A trustee under subsection (1) must release the deposit to the developer if the developer certifies in writing that
the purchaser who paid the deposit has no right to rescission under section 21 [rights of rescission],
if required, the subdivision plan, strata plan or other plan has been deposited in the appropriate land title office,
the approvals required for the lawful occupation of the development unit have been obtained, and
as applicable,
if all or part of the purchaser's interest in the development unit is registrable in a land title office, the interest has been registered in the appropriate land title office and an instrument evidencing the registration has been delivered to the purchaser, or
if all or part of the purchaser's interest in the development unit is not registrable in a land title office, an instrument evidencing the interest of the purchaser has been delivered to the purchaser.
A trustee under subsection (1) must release the deposit to the developer if the developer certifies in writing that
the purchaser who paid the deposit has no right to rescission under section 21 [rights of rescission],
the purchaser has failed to pay a subsequent deposit or the balance of the purchase price when required by the purchase agreement under which the deposit held by the trustee was paid,
under the terms of the purchase agreement, if the purchaser fails to pay a subsequent deposit or the balance of the purchase price when required, the developer may elect to cancel the purchase agreement and, if the developer elects to cancel the purchase agreement, the amount of the deposit is forfeited to the developer, and
the developer has elected to cancel the purchase agreement.
For the purposes of subsection (2) (f) and (g), the provisions of the Real Estate Services Act referred to in that subsection apply to a trustee as if the trustee were a brokerage.
Payment to a person in accordance subsection (2) (b), (c), (d) or (e) discharges the trustee from liability for the deposit in the amount paid out.
In this section:
deposit protection contract has the same meaning as in section 142 (1) of the Insurance Act;
developer's own purposes means purposes related to the development property that includes the development unit in relation to which the deposit under section 18 (1) [handling deposits] was paid, including, without limitation, the construction and marketing of that development property.
A developer who desires to use for the developer's own purposes a deposit the developer has placed with a trustee under section 18 (1), must enter into a deposit protection contract in relation to that deposit and provide notice of the deposit protection contract to the purchaser in accordance with the regulations.
A trustee must pay a deposit held under section 18 (1) to a developer who has entered into a deposit protection contract in relation to the deposit on receiving
from an insurer the original or a true copy of the deposit protection contract, and
from the developer a certification, in writing, that the purchaser who paid the deposit has no right to rescission under section 21 [rights of rescission].
If a deposit is paid under subsection (3), the developer may use that deposit only for the developer's own purposes.
Exemptions
The superintendent may exempt, with or without conditions, the following from all or part of a provision of this Part:
a person;
land that is, or will be, the subject of development;
a transaction.
The superintendent may suspend or cancel an exemption made under subsection (1).
If an exemption has been made in respect of a class of persons, land or transactions under section 46 [regulations], the superintendent may suspend or cancel the exemption in relation to a particular person, land or transaction within the class, if the superintendent has reason to believe that
the person is not complying with the terms or conditions of the exemption, or
the exemption, if applied to that land or transaction, would be detrimental to the public interest.
If the superintendent makes an exemption, or suspends or cancels an exemption, under this section, the superintendent must publish, in accordance with the regulations, the exemption, suspension or cancellation.
Assignment Reporting Requirements
In this Part:
administrator means the administrator designated under the Property Transfer Tax Act;
assignment means a transfer of some or all of the rights, obligations and benefits under a purchase agreement made in respect of a strata lot in a development property, whether the transfer is made by the purchaser under the purchase agreement to another person or is a subsequent transfer.
This Part applies in respect of purchase agreements, entered into by developers, for the sale or lease of strata lots in development properties located in British Columbia.
Unless the developer does not permit the assignment of the purchase agreement, a developer who enters into a purchase agreement for the sale or lease of a strata lot must include in the purchase agreement, in the prescribed form, all of the following:
a term prohibiting any assignment of the purchase agreement without the prior consent of the developer;
a notice that, before the developer consents to an assignment of the purchase agreement, the developer will be required to collect from the proposed parties to the assignment agreement the information and records referred to in subsection (2);
a term requiring all proposed parties to an assignment agreement to give to the developer the information and records referred to in subsection (2).
A developer must not consent to any assignment of a purchase agreement unless the developer first collects, from each proposed party to the assignment agreement, all prescribed information and records, including personal information,
respecting the identity of the party,
respecting contact and business information of the party,
respecting the terms of the assignment agreement, and
required for the purposes of section 20.5 [confidentiality].
A developer who has consented to an assignment of a purchase agreement must
collect from the parties to the assignment a copy of the written and signed assignment agreement, and
keep a copy of the assignment agreement in the prescribed manner for the prescribed period.
A developer must file with the administrator, in the form and manner required by the administrator and as required by the regulations, the following:
for each assignment to which the developer consents, the information and records collected under section 20.3 (2) [requirements respecting assignments];
The administrator may require a developer to file additional information or records for the purpose of verifying the information and records filed under subsection (1).
A developer must comply with a requirement made under subsection (2) within the period set by the administrator.
Subject to subsection (2), the administrator or another person having custody or control of information or records collected under this Part must not use or disclose the information or records except
for the purposes of administering or enforcing this Act, a taxation Act, the Home Owner Grant Act or the Land Tax Deferment Act,
in court proceedings related to this Act or an Act referred to in paragraph (a),
under an agreement that
is between the government and another government,
relates to the administration or enforcement of tax enactments, and
provides for the disclosure of information and records to and the exchange of similar information and records with that other government,
for the purpose of the compilation of statistical information by the government or the government of Canada, or
to the British Columbia Assessment Authority.
If the superintendent has custody or control of information or records collected under this Part, the superintendent must not use or disclose the information or records except for a purpose set out in subsection (1) (a) or (b).
Except in respect of a proceeding under an Act referred to in subsection (1) (a), the administrator or another person to whom subsection (1) applies may not be compelled in a civil proceeding to disclose or give evidence respecting any information or records obtained by the administrator or person in the course of exercising powers or performing duties under this Act.
The Lieutenant Governor in Council may exempt, by order, from all or part of a provision of this Part, with or without conditions,
a person,
land that is, or will be, the subject of development, or
a transaction.
Remedies and Enforcement
Remedies
A purchaser does not have a right of rescission under this section
if the purchaser is not entitled to receive a disclosure statement under this Act, or
as a result of receiving an amendment to a disclosure statement in respect of a development property, including an amendment described in section 16 (1) (a) (ii) [non-compliant disclosure statements], unless the purchaser has not previously received any disclosure statement in respect of that development property.
Regardless of whether title, or the other interest for which a purchaser has contracted, to a development unit has been transferred, a purchaser of the development unit may rescind the purchase agreement by serving written notice of the rescission on the developer within 7 days after the later of
the date that the purchase agreement was made, and
the date that the developer obtained, under section 15 (1) (c) [providing disclosure statements to purchasers], a written statement from the purchaser acknowledging that the purchaser had an opportunity to read
the disclosure statement provided under that section, or
a new disclosure statement, if any, described in section 16 (1) (a) (i) [non-compliant disclosure statements].
Subject to subsection (3.1), regardless of whether title, or the other interest for which a purchaser has contracted, to a development unit has been transferred, if a purchaser is entitled to a disclosure statement in respect of a development property under this Act and does not receive the disclosure statement, the purchaser may rescind, at any time, a purchase agreement of a development unit in that development property by serving a written notice of rescission on the developer.
Subsection (3) does not apply if the disclosure statement the purchaser is entitled to receive, but does not receive, in respect of a development property is any of the following:
an amendment to a disclosure statement;
a disclosure statement that the purchaser becomes entitled to receive as a result of a request made under section 15.1 (4) [phase disclosure statements];
a disclosure statement that the purchaser becomes entitled to receive as a result of a request made under section 15.2 (4) [consolidated disclosure statements].
Regardless of whether title, or the other interest for which a purchaser has contracted, to a development unit has been transferred, a purchaser of a development unit may rescind a purchase agreement by serving a written notice of rescission on the developer if the purchaser does not receive an amendment to a disclosure statement that the purchaser was entitled to receive, and if all of the following apply:
the purchaser does not become entitled to receive the amendment to the disclosure statement only as a result of a request made under section 15.1 (4) [phase disclosure statements] or 15.2 (4) [consolidated disclosure statements];
the amendment the purchaser is entitled to receive relates to or would have related to a fact or proposal to do something that is a material fact on the earlier of the following dates:
the date on which the notice of rescission is served on the developer;
the date on which the purchase agreement requires the developer to transfer to the purchaser title or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted;
the amendment the purchaser is entitled to receive relates to or would have related to a fact or proposal to do something that was or would have been reasonably relevant to the purchaser in deciding to enter into the purchase agreement;
no more than one year has elapsed after the transfer of title or the other interest for which that purchaser has contracted.
If a purchaser to whom title, or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted, has been transferred serves a notice of rescission on a developer, the developer may apply to court for an order that the purchaser must pay to the developer market rent for occupation of the development unit.
In this section:
developer means a developer that is required by the Act or regulations to in respect of a development property;
file a disclosure statement with the superintendent, or
provide a disclosure statement to a purchaser
director means a director of a developer at the time that the developer in respect of a development property.
filed a disclosure statement with the superintendent, or
provided a disclosure statement to any purchaser
This section does not apply to a purchaser who is not entitled to receive a disclosure statement under this Act.
If a developer files a disclosure statement respecting a development property and the disclosure statement contains a misrepresentation, a purchaser of a development unit in the development property, whether the purchaser received the disclosure statement or not,
is deemed to have relied on the misrepresentation, and
has a right of action for damages against
the developer,
a director,
a person who consented to be named, and was named, in the disclosure statement as a developer or director,
a person who authorized the filing of the disclosure statement, and
a person who signed the disclosure statement.
If subsection (3) continues to apply as if the misrepresentation had not been removed or corrected.
a disclosure statement contains a misrepresentation at the time at which a purchaser and a developer enter into a purchase agreement, and
the misrepresentation is removed or otherwise corrected after the purchaser and developer have entered into the purchase agreement,
A person is not liable to a purchaser under subsection (3) if the person proves that the purchaser had knowledge of the misrepresentation at the time at which the purchaser received the disclosure statement.
An individual is not liable to a purchaser under subsection (3) if the individual proves
that
the disclosure statement was filed without the individual's knowledge or consent, and
on becoming aware of its filing, the individual gave written notice to the developer, the superintendent and the public that it was filed without the individual's knowledge or consent, or
that, after filing the disclosure statement but before entering into a purchase agreement with the purchaser in relation to a development unit in the development property to which the disclosure statement relates, the individual
became aware of a misrepresentation in the disclosure statement,
withdrew the individual's consent to the disclosure statement, and
gave written notice to the developer, the superintendent and the public of the withdrawal and the reason for it.
An individual is not liable under subsection (3) with respect to any part of the disclosure statement made on the authority of an expert if the individual had no reasonable grounds to believe, and did not believe, that the opinion of the expert
was based on, or contained, a misrepresentation, or
was unfairly represented in the disclosure statement.
An individual is not liable under subsection (3) with respect to any part of a disclosure statement not made on the authority of an expert if the individual
made reasonable inquiries to determine whether the disclosure statement contained a misrepresentation, and
believed that there had been no misrepresentation.
An action for damages under this section may not be commenced more than 2 years after the misrepresentation on which the action is based first comes to the knowledge of the purchaser.
Subject to subsection (2), a purchase agreement in relation to a development unit is not enforceable against the purchaser by a developer who has breached any provision of Part 2 [Marketing and Holding Deposits].
A purchase agreement in relation to a development unit is enforceable against the purchaser if either of the following applies to each of the developer's breaches of Part 2:
the breach involves a disclosure statement that does not comply with the Act or the regulations, but there is no misrepresentation in the disclosure statement concerning a material fact that was or would have been reasonably relevant to the purchaser in deciding to enter into the purchase agreement;
the breach involves a disclosure statement that includes a misrepresentation concerning a material fact, but the developer was not aware of the misrepresentation at the time the purchaser and the developer entered into the purchase agreement and the misrepresentation is corrected in an amendment to the disclosure statement to which both of the following apply:
the amendment is filed with the superintendent no later than 30 days after the developer becomes aware of the misrepresentation and the amendment is provided to the purchaser within a reasonable time after filing, as required by section 16 (1) (b) [non-compliant disclosure statements];
the amendment is filed with the superintendent and provided to the purchaser no later than 14 days before the date on which the purchase agreement requires the developer to transfer to the purchaser title or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted.
Enforcement Powers
In this Division:
developer includes a former developer;
non-compliant means, in respect of a developer,
contravening a provision of this Act or the regulations,
failing to comply with the terms or conditions of
an order of the superintendent,
a permission given by the superintendent under section 10 [early marketing with permission],
a policy statement issued under section 10 (4) (b) or 13 (2) (b) [deemed adequate arrangements], and
an undertaking given under section 36 [undertakings],
failing to follow any direction of the superintendent in relation to an arrangement made under section 11 (2) (c) or (3) (b) [assurance of title] or 12 (2) (c) [utilities and services], and
making, or allowing to be made,
a misrepresentation in any record that is required to be produced or submitted under this Act, or
recipient of the notice means a person who receives a notice under section 27 (1) [notice of hearing] that a hearing will be held to determine whether a developer is, or has been, non-compliant.
The superintendent may, by order, appoint investigators for the purposes of this section by doing one or both of the following:
naming a specific person as an investigator;
providing that a person who holds a specified title or position is an investigator.
If the superintendent or an investigator has reason to believe that a developer is, or has been, non-compliant, the superintendent or investigator may conduct an investigation to determine whether the developer is, or has been, non-compliant.
For the purpose of an investigation, the superintendent or investigator may do one or more of the following:
at any time during business hours, inspect and copy records that are located on the business premises of
a developer, or
an officer, director, controlling shareholder or partner of a developer;
require a person referred to in paragraph (a) to produce information, records or other things in the person's possession or control;
require a person who the superintendent or investigator has reason to believe has in the person's possession or control information, records or other things relevant to the investigation to produce the information, records or things.
A person referred to in subsection (2) must not withhold or destroy, conceal or refuse to provide any information, record or thing reasonably required for the purposes of an investigation under this section.
An investigator who conducts an investigation under subsection (1.1) must provide the superintendent with a written report of the investigation.
The superintendent may apply to the Supreme Court for an order authorizing the seizure of records or other evidence, wherever located, belonging to or relating to a developer from the person named in the order, if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the developer is, or has been, non-compliant.
An application under subsection (1) may be made without notice to any other person unless otherwise ordered by the court.
An application under subsection (1) must be supported by an affidavit stating
the grounds for believing that the developer is, or has been, non-compliant, and
the grounds for believing that the seizure will produce evidence relevant to that matter.
In an order under subsection (1), the court may
designate the person who will conduct the seizure and authorize that person to conduct it,
state the time and place the seizure will occur, and
give any other directions necessary to carry out the seizure.
This section does not apply to records or other evidence subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Following an investigation under section 25 [investigations], the superintendent may deliver, to a person against whom an order under section 30 [orders] may be made, notice that the superintendent intends to hold a hearing under section 29 [hearings] to determine if a developer is, or has been, non-compliant.
The notice must
describe the matter that is to be the subject of the hearing,
specify the time and place set for commencement of the hearing,
advise the recipient of the notice that the superintendent is entitled to proceed with the hearing in the absence of the recipient of the notice, and
be accompanied by either
a copy of the investigator's report, if any, made under section 25 (4) [investigations], or
if no investigator's report has been made, a summary of the superintendent's investigation.
The notice must be delivered at least 21 days before the time set for the hearing as follows:
in the case of delivery to a current developer, by personal service or by mailing the notice by registered mail to the address of the developer shown in that developer's disclosure statement;
in the case of delivery to a person who is not a current developer, by personal service;
in any case, in accordance with an order for substituted service under section 43 [substituted service].
A recipient of the notice may deliver, at least 14 days or a shorter period permitted by the superintendent before the time set for the hearing, to the superintendent a written proposal that includes the person's consent to the superintendent making a specified order under section 30 [orders] without conducting a hearing.
If the superintendent accepts a proposal under subsection (1),
the superintendent may make the proposed order under section 30, and
no further proceedings may be taken under this Division with respect to the matter, other than to enforce the terms of the order as proposed.
Regardless of whether a proposal under subsection (1) has been accepted or rejected by the superintendent, the proposal may not be used
in any proceeding under this Act, other than as referred to in subsection (2) (b), or
in any civil proceeding with respect to the matter.
If a notice of hearing has been delivered in accordance with section 27 [notice of hearing], the superintendent may proceed with the hearing under this section whether or not the recipient of the notice appears in person and whether or not the recipient of the notice is represented by legal counsel at the hearing.
For the purposes of a hearing under this Act, sections 34 (3) and (4) [power to compel witnesses and order disclosure], 48 [maintenance of order at hearings] and 49 [contempt proceeding for uncooperative witness or other person] of the Administrative Tribunals Act apply to the superintendent as if the superintendent were a tribunal under that Act.
After a hearing, if the superintendent determines that a developer is, or has been, non-compliant, the superintendent may do one or more of the following:
order the developer to cease or refrain from marketing one or more development units;
order the developer to carry out a specified activity related to marketing;
order the developer to comply, or to carry out a specified activity for the purpose of complying, with a prohibition or requirement of
Part 2.1 [Assignment Reporting Requirements], or
a regulation made for the purpose of Part 2.1;
order the developer to pay amounts in accordance with section 31 [recovery of enforcement expenses];
order the developer to pay an administrative penalty in an amount of
not more than $500 000, in the case of a corporation, or
not more than $250 000, in the case of an individual.
If the superintendent intends to make an order under subsection (1) (c) or (d), the superintendent may make the order against
the developer,
a person who was an officer, director, controlling shareholder or partner of the developer at the time of non-compliance, if that person authorized, permitted or acquiesced in the non-compliance, or
both the developer and a person described in paragraph (b).
The superintendent, by order made on the application of or with the consent of a person affected by the order, may
vary or rescind an order made under subsection (1), and
The superintendent may, by an order under section 30 (1) (c) [orders], require a person described under section 30 (2) to pay the expenses, or part of the expenses, of either or both of the following:
an investigation under section 25 [investigations];
the hearing.
Expenses assessed under subsection (1)
must be for the matters, and must not exceed the amounts, set out in the regulations, and
may include remuneration expenses for employees, officers or agents of the Authority engaged in the investigation or hearing.
The superintendent may make an order referred to in section 30 (1) (a) or (b) [orders] against a developer under this section if the superintendent considers
that the developer is, or has been, non-compliant,
that the length of time that would be required to complete an investigation or hold a hearing, or both, would be detrimental to the public interest, and
that it is in the public interest to make the order.
Despite any other provision of this Division, an order may be made under this section
whether or not a notice of hearing has been issued under section 27 [notice of hearing],
without giving notice to the developer, and
without providing the developer an opportunity to be heard.
Promptly after an order under this section is made, the superintendent must deliver, in accordance with section 27 (3), to the developer who is the subject of the order
a copy of the order and written reasons for it, and
written notice that a hearing may be held respecting the order.
A developer who is the subject of an order under subsection (1) may require, within 14 days after receiving a copy of the order, a hearing before the superintendent by delivering written notice to the superintendent.
Within a reasonable time after receiving written notice referred to in subsection (4), the superintendent must
provide notice of the hearing in accordance with section 27, and
hold the required hearing in accordance with section 29 [hearings].
Following the hearing referred to in subsection (5) (b), the superintendent
must confirm, revoke or vary the order, and
may make any other order referred to in section 30 (1).
Section 30 (3) applies in respect of an order made under this section.
The superintendent must
publish, in accordance with the regulations, each order of the superintendent made under section 30 [orders] or 32 [orders in urgent circumstances], and
provide a copy of an order published under paragraph (a) to any person who requests it and pays the prescribed fee.
If the superintendent considers that a person has failed to comply with an order of the superintendent under this Division, the superintendent may file a certified copy of the order with the Supreme Court.
An order filed under subsection (1) has the same force and effect, and all proceedings may be taken on it, as if it were an order of the Supreme Court.
The superintendent may apply to the Supreme Court for an injunction restraining a person from contravening, or requiring a person to comply with,
this Act or the regulations, or
an order of the superintendent under this Act.
The court may grant an injunction sought under subsection (1) if the court is satisfied that there is reason to believe that there has been or will be a contravention of this Act, the regulations or an order referred to in that subsection.
The court may grant an interim injunction until the outcome of an application commenced under subsection (1).
If the superintendent has reason to believe that a developer is, or has been, non-compliant, the superintendent, with or without an investigation or a hearing under this Division, may
give notice to the developer of the superintendent's reason for believing that the developer is or has been non-compliant, and
accept a written undertaking from the developer to do one or more of the following:
cease or refrain from marketing one or more development units;
comply with terms or conditions set by the superintendent, which may include a condition that the developer pay the expenses, or part of the expenses, incurred by the Authority in relation to the undertaking;
do anything that the developer is required to do under this Act;
cease or refrain from doing anything that the developer is prohibited from doing under this Act.
Expenses assessed under subsection (1) (b) (ii)
must be for the matters, and must not exceed the amounts, set out in the regulations, and
may include remuneration expenses for employees, officers or agents of the Authority engaged in matters related to the undertaking.
An undertaking given by a developer under this section is binding on the developer and every director of the developer.
Appeals
A person who is the subject of an order or decision of the superintendent made under any of the following sections may appeal the decision to the financial services tribunal:
section 11 (2) (c) and (3) (b) [assurance of title];
section 12 (2) (c) [utilities and services];
section 16 (2) (c) [non-compliant disclosure statements];
section 20 (2) or (3) [superintendent's exemptions];
section 30 [orders];
section 32 [orders in urgent circumstances].
The superintendent is a party to an appeal under this section.
Sections 242.2 [practice and procedure] and 242.3 [judicial review] of the Financial Institutions Act apply in relation to an appeal under this section.
An order made under section 30 (1) (a) [orders] or 32 [orders in urgent circumstances] is not stayed by the filing of a notice of appeal under section 37 [appeals to the financial services tribunal] and may not be stayed under section 242.2 (10) (a) (i) [tribunal member hearing appeal may stay order] of the Financial Institutions Act.
Offences and Penalties
A person who does any of the following commits an offence:
contravenes
section 4 [subdivision lots and bare land strata lots], section 5 [strata lots and leasehold units], section 6 [cooperative interests], section 7 [time share interests], section 8 [shared interest in land in B.C.], section 9 [shared interests in land outside B.C.], section 10 (4) (b) [early marketing with permission], section 11 [assurance of title], section 12 [utilities and services], section 13 (2) (b) [deemed adequate arrangements], section 14 [filing disclosure statements], section 15 [providing disclosure statements to purchasers], section 15.1 (2) or (4) [phase disclosure statements], section 15.2 (2) or (4) [consolidated disclosure statements], section 16 [non-compliant disclosure statements], section 18 [handling deposits], section 19 [developer use of deposit], section 20.3 [requirements respecting assignments], section 20.4 (1) or (3) [filing information respecting assignments], section 21 (5) [rights of rescission], or section 25 (3) [investigations];
neglects or refuses to comply with an order of the superintendent under this Act;
subject to subsection (2), makes a statement in a disclosure statement filed or provided under this Act that, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which the statement is made, contains a misrepresentation;
subject to subsection (2), makes a statement in a record filed, submitted, provided or delivered under this Act, other than a disclosure statement, that, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which the statement is made, contains a false or misleading statement.
A person does not commit an offence under subsection (1) (c) or (d) if, at the time of the statement, the person
did not know that the statement contained a misrepresentation or was false or misleading, and
in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have known that the statement contained a misrepresentation or was false or misleading.
If a developer commits an offence under this Act, an officer, director, controlling shareholder or partner of the developer who authorizes, permits or acquiesces in the offence commits the same offence whether or not the developer is convicted of the offence.
Section 5 [offence to contravene any enactment] of the Offence Act does not apply to this Act or to the regulations.
A person who commits an offence under section 39 [offences] is liable,
in the case of a corporation,
on a first conviction, to a fine of not more than $1.25 million, and
on each subsequent conviction, to a fine of not more than $2.5 million, and,
in the case of an individual,
on a first conviction, to a fine of not more than $1.25 million or to imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or to both, and
on each subsequent conviction, to a fine of not more than $2.5 million or to imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or to both.
The time limit for laying an information for an offence under this Act is
2 years after the date that the facts on which the information is based arose, or
if the superintendent issues a certificate described in subsection (2), 2 years after the date that the facts on which the information is based first came to the knowledge of the superintendent.
A record purporting to have been issued by the superintendent, certifying the date on which the facts on which the information is based first came to the knowledge of the superintendent,
is admissible without proof of the signature or official position of the person appearing to have signed the certificate, and
is proof of the certified matters.
A proceeding, conviction or penalty for an offence under this Act does not relieve a person from any other liability.
General
In relation to any requirement or authorization established under this Act that a notice or another record be served on a person, that service may be done by substituted service in accordance with an order under subsection (2).
On application, the Supreme Court may order that a record referred to in subsection (1) may be served by substituted service in accordance with the order.
The superintendent may, in writing, delegate any of the superintendent's powers or duties under this Act.
The superintendent may impose conditions or restrictions on any delegation made under subsection (1).
In this section, protected individual means an individual who is any of the following:
the superintendent;
an individual acting on behalf of or under the direction of the Authority or the superintendent.
Subject to subsection (3), no legal proceeding for damages lies or may be commenced or maintained against a protected individual because of anything done or omitted
in the exercise or intended exercise of any power under this Act, or
in the performance or intended performance of any duty under this Act.
Subsection (2) does not apply to a protected individual in relation to anything done or omitted in bad faith.
Subsection (2) does not absolve the Authority from vicarious liability arising out of anything done or omitted by a protected individual for which the Authority would be vicariously liable if this section were not in force.
The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations referred to in section 41 of the Interpretation Act.
Without limiting subsection (1), the Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations as follows:
exempting from all or part of a provision of Part 2 [Marketing and Holding Deposits] or 2.1 [Assignment Reporting Requirements], with or without conditions,
a class of persons,
a class of land that is, or will be, the subject of development, or
a class of transactions;
excluding a person or a class of persons from the definition of "developer" in section 1;
prescribing periods of time for the purpose of section 8 (6) [shared interests in land in B.C.];
respecting criteria to be considered under section 8 (6) (a) (ii);
respecting the execution of disclosure statements;
respecting periods of time for which a developer must retain a written statement under section 15 [providing disclosure statements to purchasers];
defining matters as material facts and specifying whether or not new disclosure statements must be filed in respect of them if section 16 [non-compliant disclosure statements] applies;
prescribing persons who may hold a deposit in trust under this Act;
respecting the release of deposits for the purpose of section 18 (2) (i) [handling deposits];
respecting the time and manner in which notice under section 19 (2) [developer use of deposit] must be given;
prescribing the form of the terms and notice referred to in section 20.3 (1) [requirements respecting assignments];
respecting the information and records that must be collected under section 20.3 (2);
respecting the keeping of assignment agreements for the purposes of section 20.3 (3);
for the purposes of section 20.4 (1) [filing information respecting assignments],
requiring filing on a prescribed date or within a prescribed period, whether according to a schedule or with reference to the occurrence of a prescribed event, and
authorizing another person to accept filing on the administrator's behalf;
respecting service of a notice of rescission under section 21 [rights of rescission];
prescribing the types and amounts of expenses that can be recovered for the purposes of sections 31 (2) [recovery of enforcement expenses] and 36 (2) [undertakings];
respecting fees and the calculation of fees, including requiring different fees based on the number of development units within a development property, for
filing a disclosure statement,
requesting an exemption under section 20 [superintendent's exemptions],
providing copies of disclosure statements,
providing copies of orders under section 33 (b) [publication of orders],
retrieving files held by the superintendent, and
other things necessary to the administration of this Act;
respecting the collection and payment of a fee prescribed under paragraph (l) and penalties for non-payment of fees;
respecting the publication of matters as required by this Act;
defining a word or expression used but not defined in this Act;
for any other matter for which regulations are contemplated by this Act.
A prospectus or disclosure statement that was accepted for filing by the superintendent under the Real Estate Act before the repeal of that Act is deemed to be a disclosure statement filed under this Act.
Despite the repeal of section 78 [rescission] of the Real Estate Act, that section, as it read before its repeal, continues to apply to a person described in that section if a right of rescission accrued to the person under the Real Estate Act before the repeal of section 78 of that Act.
[Repealed 2004-41-61.]
The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations for meeting or removing any difficulty arising out of the transition to this Act from the Real Estate Act, and for that purpose disapplying or varying any provision of this Act.
The authority to make or amend a regulation under subsection (4), but not the authority to repeal a regulation under subsection (4), ends 3 years after the date on which subsection (4) comes into force.
administrator has the same meaning as in section 20.1 [definitions];
assignment has the same meaning as in section 20.1;
assignment agreement means an assignment agreement referred to in section 20.3 (3) (a) [requirements respecting assignments];
assignment information and records means the information and records described in section 20.3 (2);
pre-existing purchase agreement means a purchase agreement entered into before the date section 20.3 comes into force.
If a pre-existing purchase agreement provides that an assignment of the purchase agreement requires the consent of the developer, the developer may consent to the assignment only if that developer first makes a reasonable effort to collect, from each proposed party to the assignment agreement, assignment information and records.
If a developer consents to an assignment of a pre-existing purchase agreement, the developer must comply with section 20.3 (3).
If a pre-existing purchase agreement provides that an assignment of that purchase agreement does not require the consent of the developer, or is silent with respect to obtaining the consent of the developer, but the developer receives notice of an assignment, the developer must make a reasonable effort to
collect, from each party to the assignment agreement, assignment information and records, and
collect a copy of the assignment agreement and keep it in accordance with section 20.3 (3) (b).
Part 2.1 [Assignment Reporting Requirements] applies to assignment information and records and an assignment agreement collected under this section as if they were collected under section 20.3 (2) and (3) [requirements respecting assignments].
If a developer does not collect assignment information and records in accordance with section 47.2 [transition — duties if assignment of pre-existing purchase agreement], the developer must file a statement with the administrator and the statement
must indicate that no assignment information or records were collected under section 47.2 (1) or (3) (a), and
must be filed in the form and manner required by the administrator and as required by the regulations.
Part 2.1 [Assignment Reporting Requirements] applies to a statement filed under this section as if it were a statement filed under section 20.4 (1) (b).
The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations for meeting or removing any difficulty arising out of the transition to Part 2.1 [Assignment Reporting Requirements], and for that purpose disapplying or varying any provision of
Division 4 [Disclosure Statements] of Part 2 [Marketing and Holding Deposits],
Part 2.1, or
sections 47.2 [transition — duties if assignment of pre-existing purchase agreement] and 47.3 [transition — if no information or records collected].
The authority to make or amend a regulation under this section, but not the authority to repeal a regulation under this section, ends 3 years after the date on which this section comes into force.
48-60
61
The provisions of this Act referred to in column 1 of the following table come into force as set out in column 2 of the table: