The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
THE CHIEF JUSTICE—We do not need to hear you Mr. Sgayias. We are all of the opinion that s. 23(1) of the Canada Evidence Act, even if not qualified by s. 30(2) of the Immigration Act, 1976, is satisfied by the record produced in this case against the appellant. We do not find that the adjudicator proceeded without evidence, and he had a broad discretion to determine what credibility and trustworthiness should be attached to the evidence adduced before him.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellant: Cassels, Brock, Toronto.
Solicitor for the respondent: R. Tassé, Ottawa.
Statutes and regulations cited
-
Canada Evidence Act
-
Unresolved citations
- s. 30(2) of the Immigration Act, 1976