R. v. Hagenlocher

[1982] 2 SCR 531 Court SCC Decision date 1982-10-05 Docket 16907 English

PartiesHer Majesty The Queen Appellant·Rudolf Rolf Hagenlocher Respondent

Counsel (4)

J. Montgomery, Q.C., for the appellant.
David Margolis and Kenneth Zaifman, for the respondent.
Solicitor for the appellant: Deputy Attorney-General of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
Solicitor for the respondent: David Margolis, Winnipeg.

Judges Laskin, Bora; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha

Delivered by Majority

On appeal from Manitoba

Subjects Criminal law

Contents

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

THE CHIEF JUSTICE—We do not need to hear you, Mr. Margolis and Mr. Zaifman. We are all of the opinion that the conclusions reached by the majority judgment of the Manitoba Court of Appeal in applying the Kienapple principle were correct and hence this appeal must accordingly be dismissed.

Judgment accordingly.

Solicitor for the appellant: Deputy Attorney-General of Manitoba, Winnipeg.

Solicitor for the respondent: David Margolis, Winnipeg.