The following is the judgment delivered by
1. The Court–Two points were raised on this appeal.
2. On the first point, we all agreed that the trial judge and the Court of Appeal of Ontario were correct in holding that where an accused consents under s. 429.1 of the Criminal Code to be tried by a “court composed of a judge who is not a judge of the superior court of criminal jurisdiction”, the Attorney General or his agent may choose to have him tried either before a county or district court judge and a jury or before a supreme court judge and a jury.
3. On the second point, we agree with the Court of Appeal that the trial judge made no error in admitting similar fact evidence in this case and that his charge on this matter was acceptable.
4. The appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Solicitors for the appellants Bell and Blake: Clayton C. Ruby and Melvyn Green, Toronto.
Solicitor for the appellant Dempsey: Ronald R. Price, Kingston.
Solicitor for the appellants Beatteay, Caruso and Gillespie: Alan D. Gold, Toronto.
Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for the Province of Ontario, Toronto.
Statutes and regulations cited
-
- s. 429.1