R. v. Garlow

[1984] 1 SCR 386 Court SCC Decision date 1984-05-03 Docket 17128 English

PartiesHer Majesty The Queen (Plaintiff) Appellant·Mark Anthony Garlow (Defendant) Respondent

Counsel (4)

David A. Fairgrieve, for the appellant.
Andrew Kerekes and Irwin Koziebrocki, for the respondent.
Solicitor for the appellant: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto.
Solicitors for the respondent: Kerekes, Collins, Toronto.

Judges Ritchie, Roland Almon; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha

Decision 6–1 Majority (6) · RITCHIE J. (1)

On appeal from Ontario

Subjects Criminal law

Contents

Majority

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

RITCHIE J.

RITCHIE J.—For the reasons given by the Court of Appeal the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment accordingly.

Solicitor for the appellant: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto.

Solicitors for the respondent: Kerekes, Collins, Toronto.