R. v. Brese

[1984] 2 SCR 333 Court SCC Decision date 1984-10-31 Docket 17243 English

PartiesHer Majesty The Queen Appellant·Gary Gordon Brese, Allan Richard Andrews, David Frederick Ritch, Robert Cody McCutcheon and Avora Ann Crawshaw Respondents

Counsel (10)

Julius A. Isaac, Q.C., and Shelagh R. Creagh, for the appellant.
A.C. Rice, for the respondent Brese.
Howard Rubin, for the respondents Andrews and Ritch.
C.A. Kent, for the respondent McCutcheon.
B. Beresh, for the respondent Crawshaw.
Solicitor for the appellant: R. Tassé, Ottawa.
Solicitor for the respondent Brese: A.C. Rice, Edmonton.
Solicitor for the respondents Andrews and Ritch: Howard Rubin, Vancouver.
Solicitor for the respondent McCutcheon: C.A. Kent, Edmonton.
Solicitor for the respondent Crawshaw: B. Beresh, Edmonton.

Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric

Delivered by Majority

On appeal from Alberta

Subjects Criminal law

Contents

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

THE CHIEF JUSTICE—It will not be necessary to call upon you Mr. Rice, Mr. Beresh, Miss Kent. We are in substantial agreement with the majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Judgment accordingly.

Solicitor for the appellant: R. Tassé, Ottawa.

[Page 334]

Solicitor for the respondent Brese: A.C. Rice, Edmonton.

Solicitor for the respondents Andrews and Ritch: Howard Rubin, Vancouver.

Solicitor for the respondent McCutcheon: C.A. Kent, Edmonton.

Solicitor for the respondent Crawshaw: B. Beresh, Edmonton.