← Cases

Franklin v. The Queen

[1985] 1 SCR 293 Court SCC Decision date 1985-04-04 Docket 17484 English

PartiesRonald Arthur Franklin Appellant·Her Majesty The Queen Respondent

Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Estey, Willard Zebedee; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric; La Forest, Gérard V.

Delivered by Majority

On appeal from Ontario

Subjects Criminal law

Contents

The following is the judgment delivered by

1. The Court‑‑We are all of the view that this appeal should fail. The decision of this Court in R. v. Krannenburg, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 1053, is applicable for trials held by magistrates sitting under Parts XVI or XXIV of the Criminal Code .
2. We do not agree, however, with the Ontario Court of Appeal's characterization of the setting of trial dates as administrative in nature. As this Court noted in R. v. Chabot, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 985, reasonable procedural latitude is desirable in proceedings pursuant to indictment. There will be no loss of jurisdiction when a trial court, acting on an indictment, fails to proceed at the time set for trial, absent unconstitutional conduct.
3. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Solicitor for the appellant: John A. Howlett, Toronto.
Solicitor for the respondent: R. Tassé, Ottawa.

Cases cited

Statutes and regulations cited