R. v. Reakes

[1988] 1 SCR 395 Court SCC Decision date 1988-03-01 Docket 20465 English

PartiesAndrew McDonald Reakes Appellant·Her Majesty The Queen Respondent

Judges Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire

Decision 4–1 Majority (4) · Estey J. (1)

On appeal from British Columbia

Subjects Criminal law

Contents

Majority

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

Estey J.

1. Estey J.‑‑We are all of the view that the appeal must fail. We find no error in the disposition of the appeal by the majority of the Court of Appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment accordingly.

Solicitors for the appellant: Hogan & Company, Vancouver.

Solicitor for the respondent: The Ministry of the Attorney General of British Columbia, Vancouver.