← Cases

Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada

[1991] 3 SCR 689 Court SCC Decision date 1991-12-09 Docket 21921 English

PartiesSun Life Assurance Company of Canada Appellant·Canadian Human Rights Commission Respondent·The Attorney General of Canada Interveners·the Attorney General for Ontario Interveners·the Attorney General of Quebec Interveners

Judges La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank

Decision 5–1–1 Majority (5) · La Forest J. (1) · McLachlin J. (1)

On appeal from Federal Court of Appeal

Subjects Constitutional law

Contents

Majority

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

La Forest J.

La Forest J. ‑‑ It will not be necessary to hear from you Mr. Duval. The Court is ready to hand down judgment. The judgment will be pronounced by Justice McLachlin.
//McLachlin J.//

McLachlin J.

McLachlin J. ‑‑ This case concerns the validity of a search warrant issued by the Canadian Human Rights Commission against the Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada in respect of a complaint against the Bank of Montreal. We are all of the view that the warrant was properly issued given that the complaint is made solely against the Bank of Montreal. At this stage, the matter is investigatory and it is not directed at the Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellant: Tory Tory DesLauriers & Binnington, Toronto.
Solicitor for the respondent: Canadian Human Rights Commission, Ottawa.
Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General of Canada: John C. Tait, Ottawa.
Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General for Ontario: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto.
Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General of Quebec: Monique Rousseau, Ste‑Foy.