← Cases

R. v. Atkinson

[1992] 3 SCR 465 Court SCC Decision date 1992-11-02 Docket 22691, 22738 English

PartiesGeorge William Atkinson Appellants·Ernest Gordon Atkinson Appellants·Her Majesty The Queen Respondent

Judges La Forest, Gérard V.; Sopinka, John; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank

Decision 3–1–1 Majority (3) · La Forest J. (1) · Cory J. (1)

On appeal from Ontario

Subjects Constitutional law

Contents

Majority

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

La Forest J.

La Forest J. ‑‑ It will not be necessary to hear from you Mr. Butt. The Court is ready to hand down judgment. The judgment will be pronounced by Mr. Justice Cory.
//Cory J.//

Cory J.

Cory J. ‑‑ It may be that we would not agree with the reasons of the Court of Appeal on the issue of waiver. However we are in substantial agreement with the balance of their reasoning and the result they reached. Clearly the complexity of this case is an important factor that must be taken into account in considering the question of delay.
In the circumstances the appeal will be dismissed and an order will go expediting the trial.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellant George William Atkinson: Gold & Fuerst, Toronto.
Solicitors for the appellant Ernest Gordon Atkinson: Duncan, Fava & Schermbrucker, Toronto.
Solicitor for the respondent: The Ministry of the Attorney General, Toronto.