Majority
The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
Lamer C.J.
Lamer C.J. ‑‑ Mr. Willis, you gave the very difficult case you had the best possible day in Court a barrister can. Unfortunately we cannot accede to your arguments.
Essentially this case rests upon the interpretation of a contract and the statutory interpretation of s. 4 of the Interest Act , R.S.C., 1985, c. I‑15 . Both matters were carefully considered by the Court of Appeal and we feel that we cannot usefully add to the reasons below, with which we are in substantial agreement.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed with costs in this Court only.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellants: Cleall, Pahl, Edmonton.
Solicitors for the respondent: Bennett, Jones, Verchere, Calgary.
Solicitor for the intervener Borrowers' Action Society: Margaret
Cowtan, Calgary.
Solicitors for the intervener Canadian Bankers' Association: McLennan, Ross, Edmonton.
Solicitors for the intervener T. Eaton Co.: Milner, Fenerty, Edmonton.
Solicitors for the intervener Canadian Tire Acceptance Ltd.: Cassels, Brock & Blackwell, Toronto.
Statutes and regulations cited
-
Interest Act