The majority of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal (
(1996), 178 N.B.R. (2d) 1),
per Bastarache J.A. (as he then was) rejected Savoie J.’s conclusion that
s. 87 applies only to property located on a reserve. It held that
s. 87 confers on Indians the right to use or consume personal property on the reserve without taxation. Since most property consumed or used on-reserve in New Brunswick is purchased off-reserve, the right would be meaningless without the right to purchase goods off-reserve tax-free. Therefore,
s. 87 must extend to purchases off the reserve. Hoyt C.J. (Turnbull J.A. concurring) dissented, holding that the only purpose of
s. 87 was to protect Indians from being dispossessed of their on-reserve personal property by taxation.