Majority
p. 922Theresa Miller, by George Miller, Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. William Forrest, Appellant.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Hiseóck, J., Who dissented upon the ground that it was error to refuse to charge as requested hy defendant’s counsel,, that in addition to the other elements referred to in the charge, plaintiff “ must shoiV that the dog was improperly confined, that he was let loose'negligently.”-’ ■ ' -