← Cases

Lischinsky v. Hellinger

112 A.D. 894 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 894
In the Matter of the Application of Louis Lischinsky, Appellant, v. Samuel Hellinger, an Attorney at Law, Respondent.

Headnote

Appeal from an order denying a motion to compel an attorney to pay over certain moneys.

To- obviate any question as to the order herein being pleaded as a bar, it should he modified by adding a provision thereto that it is without

p. 895
prejudice to such further action by petitioner as he may be advised, And as so modified it should be affirmed, without costs. Present — O’Brien, P. J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and'as modified affirmed, without costs. Order filed.