Hyperlawhypertext legal database Fox v. New York City Interborough Railway Co. 112 A.D. 910

← Cases

Fox v. New York City Interborough Railway Co.

112 A.D. 910 Court N.Y. App. Div. Docket No. 2 English

Delivered by Clarke, J. :

Contents

Majority

p. 910
Frederick P. Fox and Edward J. Keogh, Respondents, v. New York City Interborough Railway Company, Appellant.
(No. 2.)

Headnote

Appeal from an order denying a motion for a reargument.

This was an appeal from an order denying a motion for a reargument of the' motion for the continuance of an injunction pendente lite herein. As upon appeal the original order continuing -the in j unction has been reversed by_ the order of this court, handed down with an opinion this day {ante, p. 832), it is only necessary to affirm the order herein appealed- from, without costs. Ingraham,-. McLaughlin, Laughlin and Houghton, JJ., concurred. Order affirmed, without Costs. Order filed.