← Cases

Cerro De Pasco Tunnel & Mining Co. v. Haggin

114 A.D. 116 Court First Department, Decision date 1906-06-15 English

Contents

Majority

p. 116
Cerro De Pasco Tunnel and Mining Company, Appellant, v. James B. Haggin, Respondent.[1]
First Department,
June 15, 1906.

Headnote

Appeal by the plaintiff, the Cerro De Pasco Tunnel and Mining Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 25th day of April, 1906, directing that the plaintiff be precluded from giving any evidence of certain affirmative allegations of the complaint as to which it failed to serve particulars as directed.
John J. Kirby, for the appellant.
Clifton P. Williamson, for the respondent.

For the reasons given in Reader v. Haggin ( 114 App. Div. 112 ), decided herewith, the order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and with leave to the respondent to apply ■ to have the appellant furnish the further particulars required by the original order.

Present — O’Brien, P. J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to respondent to apply to have appellant furnish the further particulars required by the original order. Settle order on notice.