← Cases

Littner v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

120 A.D. 874 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 874
Rose Littner, an Infant, by Marcus Littner, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Interurban Street Railway Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion, Present — Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Lambert, JJ., Laughlin, J., dissenting on the ground of error in charging last two requests of counsel for defendant; and Lambert, J., on the ground of error in charging second lg.st request, ■