← Cases

Lusk v. Lee

122 A.D. 900 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 900
Fred Lusk, Respondent, v. Fred Lee and James Lee, Appellants.

Orders affirmed, with ten "dollars costs and disbursements. Held, that under the circumstances of this case it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion in denying the motions. All concurred, except Spring and Robson, JJ., who dissented.