← Cases

Parkinson v. Munroe

130 A.D. 903 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 903
Charles Parkinson, Respondent, v. George H. Munroe and Alexander Munroe, Composing the Firm of Munroe & Munroe, and Others, Impleaded with Lord’s Court Building and The Empire State Surety Company, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Ingraham, J., dissented on the ground that the evidence is not sufficient to show a consent by the appellant within the Lien Law.[1]

* See Laws of 1897, chap. 418, § 3.— [Rep.