Stiebel v. Haigney — 134 A.D. 522

Majority

p. 522

Samuel J. Stiebel and Others, Copartners, Doing Business under the Name of Stiebel, Hernsheim and Company, Respondents, v. John J. Haigney, Appellant, Impleaded with John Glassford and Ellen Hollander, Defendants.

(No. 2.)

First Department,

November 19, 1909.

Headnote

(See head note in Stiebel v. Haigney,,No, 1, ante, p. 316.)

Appeal by the defendant, John J. Haigney, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 9th day of February, 1909, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the

p. 523

Hew York Special Term in a suit in equity to foreclose a lien upon certain shares of stock.

Ernest P. Seelman of counsel [Seelman & Farley, attorneys], for the appellant.

Francis L. Kohlman of counsel [Hand, Bonney & Jones, attorneys], for the respondents.

This case was tried at the same time as Stiebel v. Haigney, No. 1 ( 134 App. Div. 516 ), the opinion in which is handed down herewith, and for the reasons there stated this judgment should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Ingraham, Laughlix, Houghton and Scott, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cases cited

Stiebel v. Haignet 134 App. Div. 516 N.Y. App. Div. 1909-11-19 p. 523