← Cases

Casey v. Davis & Furber Machine Co.

136 A.D. 945 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 945
John J. Casey, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Davis & Furber Machine Company, Appellant. Mae Pilger, by Guardian, etc., Appellant, v. Raymond C. Bell, Respondent. Adriance, Platt & Company, Appellant, v. Eben H. Bates, Respondent. Carbonating Apparatus Company, Respondent, v. Charles H.
p. 946
Sagar Company, Appellant. Mattie Laux, Appellant, v. George T. Loomis and Others, Respondents. Thomas P. Mullaney, Respondent, v. Edward A. Kingston, Appellant. Hattie J. Wiltsie, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent. Cain Mahaney, Appellant, v. Buffalo Structural Steel Company, Respondent. Buffalo, Lockport and Rochester Railway Company, Respondent, v. John R. Noyer and Others, Appellants. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Peter Lehrbach and Others, Respondents.

These-cases having been twice reached in their regular order and passed, are dismissed, with costs, under General Rule No. 39.