← Cases

Chapman v. L. E. Waterman Co.

138 A.D. 897 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 897
Isaac E. Chapman and William L. Chapman, Appellants, v. L. E. Waterman Company, Respondent.

Headnote

Appeal from an order entered in the New York county clerk’s office March 21, 1910, denying a motion for an injunction pendente lite.

Without passing upon the right of the plaintiff to a permanent injunction, we think, upon the record as it stands, that the court was justified in refusing to grant a temporary injunction, leaving it to the court upon the trial to give such judgment as the evidence would justify. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.