Hyperlawhypertext legal database Tolson v. Schmidt 139 A.D. 898

← Cases

Tolson v. Schmidt

139 A.D. 898 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Decision Majority · Dissent — McLaughlin, J. (dissenting):

Contents
p. 898
Arthur N. Tolson, Appellant, v. Frederick Schmidt, .Respondent.

.Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order for plaintiff’s examination before-trial.- '

Order affirmed, with ten ' dollars • costs and disbursements. No opinion.Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin (dissenting), -Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ, . . ' .

I dissent, upon the ground that there is nothing - in'the moving papers to show that the examination of the plaintiff is necessary ^ or material for the establishment of the defendant’s defense..