Conkling v. Krandusky

139 A.D. 925 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 925

Robert Conkling, Appellant, v. Josephine Krandusky, Respondent.

Judgment aflfirmed¡ with costs. See opinion by .Spring, J., on former appeal in same case, reported at 127 Appellate Division, 761. All concurred, except ■McLennan, P. J., and Kruse, J., who dissented on the grounds stated in the opinion by McLennan, P. J., on the former appeal.