Hyperlawhypertext legal database Sontheimer Embroidery Manufacturing Co. v. Maier 141 A.D. 927

← Cases

Sontheimer Embroidery Manufacturing Co. v. Maier

141 A.D. 927 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Decision Majority · Dissent — Laughlin, J.

Contents
p. 927
Sontheimer Embroidery Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Bertha Maier, Appellant.

Headnote

Appeal from a judgment entered on the 11th day of- May, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered on the 23d day of May, 1910, denying a motion for a new trial. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.

(dissenting): I dissent on the exception to the charge with - respect to the inference to be drawn by the jury on account of the failure of the defendant to produce or issue a commission to take the testimony of Russ, her former attorney. -.