Howe v. International Railway Co.

145 A.D. 908 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Judges All concurred, except Williams, J., who dissented upon the ground of errors in refusal to charge as requested, in reception of evidence, and excessive damages. Spring, J., not sitting.

Contents

Majority

p. 908

Maria Eva Howe, Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

All concurred, except Williams, J., who dissented upon the ground of errors in refusal to charge as requested, in reception of evidence, and excessive damages. Spring, J., not sitting.