Hathaway v. Graham

145 A.D. 937 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Judges Jenks, P. J., Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Contents

Majority

p. 937

Edmund W. Hathaway, Respondent, v. James P. Graham, Appellant, Impleaded with Charles D. Smith and Others, Respondents.

We think that the obligation imposed upon the plaintiff and the defendant Titcomb^ should be enlarged so as to require them to respond to the partnership. The judgment should be modified in t as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Jenks, P. J., Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.