Hovey v. Richardson — 147 A.D. 892

Majority

p. 892

Le Roy F. Hovey, Respondent, v. Thomas D. Richardson, Jr., Appellant.

First Department,

December 29, 1911.

Headnote

See head note in Hovey v. De Long Hooh & Bye Co. (ante, p. 881).

Appeal by the defendant, Thomas D. Richardson, Jr., from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 4th day .of May, 1911,. reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York in favor of the defendant and granting a new trial.

Charles E. Rushmore, for the appellant.

Lester S. Kafer, for the respondent.

For the reasons stated in the prevailing opinion,. herewith handed down, in Hovey v. De Long Hook & Eye Co. ( 147 App. Div. 881 ) the determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs.

Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Miller and Scott, JJ., dissented.

Determination affirmed, 'with costs.

Cases cited

Hovey v. De Long Hook & Eye Co. 147 App. Div. 881 N.Y. App. Div. 1911-12-29 p. 892