← Cases

Metz v. Manhattan Beach Bathing Co.

148 A.D. 922 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 922
Emma C. Metz, Respondent, v. Manhattan Beach Bathing Company, Appellant.

—Appellant presents sufficient excuse for delay in prosecuting the appeal. ' Ho affidavit is presented as required by rule[1] adopted by this court October 4, 1910, showing merits. The appellant may have until January 15,1912, to submit such affidavit and serve copy on his adversary,, who then may serve replying affidavits within two days. Present—J enks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Bui-r, Woodward and Rich, JJ.

* See App. Div. Rules, 2d Dept., Special Rule.— [Rep.