Hyperlawhypertext legal database City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad 153 A.D. 938

← Cases

City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

153 A.D. 938 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 938
The City of Corning, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent, Impleaded with the Fall Brook Railway Company.

Judgment, so far as appealed from, affirmed; with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Lambert, J., who dissented upon the ground that the entire structure between the two stone abutments constitutes a bridge within the meaning of the statute.[1]

* See Railroad Law (Gen. Laws, chap. 39; Laws of 1890, chap. 565), § 64, added by Laws of 1897, chap. 754, as amd. by Laws of 1902, chap. 140; since amd. by Laws of 1909, chap. 153; now Railroad Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 49; Laws of 1910, chap. 481), §93.— [Rep.