← Cases

Bauer v. Montague Mailing Machinery Co.

157 A.D. 936 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 936
Fred Bauer, an Infant, etc., by Jacob Bauer, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Montague Mailing Machinery Company, Respondent.

Motion for reargument or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. If the defendant feels aggrieved by the erroneous statement as to the act of 1902[1] no doubt leave will be granted to it at Special Term to serve such amended answer as deemed advisable without terms. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.

* See Laws of 1902, chap. 600, which was stated to have been repealed by Labor Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 31; Laws of 1909, chap. 36), art. 14, as amd. by Laws of 1910, chap. 352. —[Rep.