← Cases

Haak v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.

162 A.D. 928 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 928
Susan Haak, Respondent, v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway Company, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and dis

p. 929
bursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented; Foote, J., not sitting.