← Cases

Uhl v. International Railway Co.

162 A.D. 929 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 929
Rosina Uhl, as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that under the rule of law charged by the trial judge no negligence was shown entitling the plaintiff to recover.