Majority
p. 964Willis S. Housel, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff made out a prima facie ease under the Federal Safety Appliance Act and the Federal Employers’ Liability Aet.[1] Kate M. 0’Neill, Respondent, v. John A. Dicks, Appellant.—Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
† † See 37 U. S. Stat. at Large, 531, chap. 196; 29 id. 85, chap. 87; 32 id. 943, chap. 976; 35 id. 470, chap. 225; 36 id. 298, chap. 160; 36 id. 913, chap. 103; 35 id. 65, chap. 149, asamd. by 36 id. 291, chap. 143.—[Rep.