← Cases

Arroll v. Buffalo, Lockport & Rochester Railway Co.

164 A.D. 970 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 970
James T. Arroll, Respondent, v. Buffalo, Lockport and Rochester Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Robson and Merrell, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, and upon the further ground that the court committed reversible error in permitting the plaintiff to testify under defendant’s objection that the defendant’s claim agent, Hoenig, called upon him after the accident.