Palm, Fechteler & Co. v. Fechteler

165 A.D. 989 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 989

Palm, Fechteler & Company, Respondent, v. Frank Fechteler and Another, Appellants.

Headnote

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ., dissented on the ground that it was error to exclude defendant from proving the expenses involved in making the profit which was charged.