← Cases

Pakulski v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

168 A.D. 936 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 936
Vincent Pakulski, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff was himself negligent as matter of law,' since there was no emergency, invitation or urgent motive, to excuse his attempt to board defendant’s moving train.