Mautz v. Consolidated Rendering Co.

170 A.D. 938 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 938

Gilbert Mautz, Respondent, v. Consolidated Rendering Company and Others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Merrell and Foote, JJ., who dissented and voted for reversal as to the Consolidated Rendering Company on the ground that it does not appear that said company was polluting the stream in question at the time the action was commenced.