Bird v. International Railway Co.

171 A.D. 973 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 973

Elsie H. Bird and Another, as Executors, etc., Respondents, v. International Railway Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

—Judg

p. 974

ment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Footé, J., who dissented upon the ground that the court erred in charging the jury that the defendant was called upon to have the car approach the usual stopping place under control.