Lovas v. International Railway Co.

173 A.D. 1003 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 1003

Mary Lovas and Another, as Administrators, etc., Respondents, v. International Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence

p. 1004

on the finding that the plaintiff’s intestate crossed over in front of the south-hound car.