Hyperlawhypertext legal database Staub v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co. 174 A.D. 852

← Cases

Staub v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

174 A.D. 852 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 852
Mary Staub, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Appellant.

Headnote

Appeal from an order granting the plaintiff’s motion for a preference.

Prom the papers it appears that the plaintiff, who was inj ured in October, 1914, is now employed, earning wages and board, and there are no such special circumstances shown as would warrant a preference over other issues. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.