Buynofsky v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

183 A.D. 901 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 901

Joseph Buynofsky, Respondent, v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Appellant.

Headnote

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

No opinion. Mills, Rich and Kelly, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., and Blaekmar, J., dissented for the reason that they are of opinion that the defendant did not admit in its pleadings that it was engaged exclusively in interstate commerce, or that the plaintiff ■ at the time of the accident was so engaged.