Majority
p. 949Karl J. Lundquist, Appellant, v. Ida Lundquist, Respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Thomas, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented upon the ground that the proof does not establish a ease within the rule of Kennedy v. Kennedy ( 73 N. Y. 369 ); Barber v. Barber ( 168 App. Div. 212 ), and Donohue v. Donohue (180 id. 561), with whom Blackmar, J., concurred.
Cases cited
- Kennedy v. Kennedy 73 N. Y. 369 p. 949