Crowell v. Crowell

186 A.D. 961 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 961

Charles H. Crowell, Appellant, v. Leila E. Crowell, Respondent.

We think that the defendant is entitled to the alimony pendente lite, as determined by the Special Term, and to a counsel fee (Waterman v. Waterman, 147 App. Div. 464 ), but that the amount thereof should be reduced

p. 962

to $250. The order is thus modified, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.