Lamchick v. Goldstein

186 A.D. 967 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 967

Louis Lamchick, Respondent, Appellant, v. Robert Goldstein and Others, Appellants, Respondents.

Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concurred; Blaekmar and Jay-cox, JJ., dissented on the ground that this is an action at law for the breach of a contract, and by far the greater portion of the complaint is irrelevant, immaterial and redundant.