Hyperlawhypertext legal database Zeisler v. Dandridge Co. 187 A.D. 903

← Cases

Zeisler v. Dandridge Co.

187 A.D. 903 Court N.Y. App. Div. Docket Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2; Appeal No. 3 English

Contents

Majority

p. 903
Milton Zeisler, Appellant, v. Dandridge Company, Inc., Respondent.
p. 904
Milton Zeisler, Appellant, v. Dandridge Company, Inc., Respondent. Milton Zeisler, Appellant, v. Dandridge Company, Inc., Respondent.
(Appeal No. 1.)
(Appeal No. 2.)
(Appeal No. 3.) 3.)—Motion

Motion for reargument denied. Motion in Appeal No. 3 granted to the extent of amending the order so as to provide that, in case such amendment be had and costs paid, the judgment be opened. Present — Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ. Order to be settled on notice before Mr. Justice Blackmar.