People v. Raquette Falls Land Co.

Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, for the reasons stated by Borst, J., at Special Term (Reported in 100 Misc. Rep. 601 ); and also because the question, if valid, that plaintiff having vacated the judgment in the Essex county action the defendant is entitled to similar relief in this action, should have been raised by the defendant and adjudicated in that action.