Shapiro v. Kenmare Auto Co. — 197 A.D. 935

Majority

p. 935

Henry Shapiro and Another, Doing Business under the Name of Herbert Hecht & Co., Respondents, v. Kenmare Auto Company, Inc.,

p. 936

Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. .No opinion. Present — Dowling, Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ. Greenbaum, J., dissents. Dowling, J., dissents on the ground that the plaintiffs have failed to establish that they procured a customer who was financially able to enter into a lease or sublease of the premises in question.