← Cases

Luzzatto v. Kaplan

201 A.D. 841 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 841
Lazarus Luzzatto, Respondent, v. Harry Kaplan, Appellant.

Determination affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the transaction did not constitute a loan of money, upon which alone usury can be predicated.[1] Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.

* See General Business Law, §§ 370, 371.— [Rep.