Majority
p. 835Before State Industrial Board, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim of Himan Krinsky, for Compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, v. Ward & Gow.
Motion in so far as it asks for an order in accordance with the mandate of the United States Supreme Court granted,[1] Motion in so far as it asks for the granting of costs in all courts denied, without costs, on the ground that the affirmance by the United States Supreme Court “ with costs ” meant only costs in that court.
† † See Ward v. Krinsky (-U. S.-; 66 L. ed.-[U. S. Adv. Ops. 1921-22, p. 616], affg. Krinsky v. Ward, 193 App. Div. 557 ; affd., 231 N. Y. 525 ).— [Rep.